Estimator · BIM modelling fees
BIM Budget Starter
Build an indicative low, typical and high BIM modelling fee at LOD 400 from your own rates per square metre and per sheet, with the core split, add-ons and the sheet cross-check shown line by line.
Free to useNo account neededInputs stay in your tabAssumptions checked September 2026Owner-approved for preliminary use · not independently reviewed
Not independently reviewed, and not calibrated. The percentages behind this tool come from one practitioner’s rate card, recorded on 17 September 2026 with status Draft, and they have never been tested against a completed project. Every result reportsNOT_CALIBRATED and requires professional review before it reaches a quotation, a fee submission or a contract commitment.
What this tool does
An indicative low, typical and high direct BIM production cost for a single project at LOD 400, from quantities and rates you enter in your own currency, and the core split and add-on percentages of one KSA practitioner rate card.
It is not a quotation, a selling price, a profit or overhead calculator, a team-size or programme tool, or a calibrated method. VAT, IT infrastructure, overhead and profit are excluded and added on top by you.
The method never supplies a rate. The rate fields start empty and stay empty. The owner’s reference card is provenance for the percentages and is never placed in a rate box.
Start with what you know
Your answers stay in this tab. Nothing is stored, and nothing is sent anywhere. Use nonconfidential labels. A blank quantity leaves the figure that depends on it unresolved, or makes a route unavailable. It never becomes zero.
Result
No result yet. Answer the questions marked required to calculate and required for this estimate, then select Calculate.
How the method works
- Record the inputs: currency, modelled area A and its measurement basis, floors, the sheet count N and whether it was entered or derived, the core disciplines, the add-ons (§5 step 1).
- Enter the rates. A low and a high figure for the route in use, in your own currency. The fields start empty: the method never suggests a rate. One figure is allowed, and the scenarios then differ only by the ranged add-ons (§5 step 2).
- Choose the route. B = A x area rate, or N x sheet rate, or both added together on the combined route. There is no weighting factor: the rate pair a firm uses together already carries the split (§5 step 3).
- Position the ranged parameters and record a one-line reason for each. Simple takes your low rate, Typical the midpoint of your own low and high, Complex your high rate (§5 step 4, §6).
- Core fee C = B x the sum of the selected shares from P-03 to P-06. All four selected gives C = B (§5 step 6).
- Add-on fee D = B x the sum of the selected add-on percentages from P-07 to P-12. Add-ons always use the full B, even when the core scope is partial (§5 step 7).
- Total F = C + D, reported low, typical, high and selected. Low uses your low rates with every ranged add-on Simple; high uses your high rates with every one Complex. The selected figure lies between them (§5 step 8).
On the owner’s card the combined rates are exactly half of each standalone rate, so the split already lives in the rates a firm uses together. There is no weighting factor. The route decides which rates you are asked for, and nothing else multiplies them. Running a combined rate pair with no sheet count prices half the work, which is why that case refuses rather than continuing.
Full method, parameter register, validation rules, evidence register, calibration plan and open owner decisions: AECEQ BIM Modelling Fee Estimation Methodology (KSA, LOD 400) v0.13, Register v0.11, 17 September 2026. View methodology.
The percentages this tool applies
Every percentage below is expert judgment recorded on 17 September 2026 with status Draft, applied as a share of the full base fee B. They are not editable here: changing one is a methodology change, not a user setting.
Parameter register
If columns extend beyond the screen, swipe this table sideways or focus it and use the left/right arrow keys.
| ID | Parameter | Applies to | Simple | Typical | Complex | How the typical value was set |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P-03 | Architecture share | Core | 35% | 35% | 35% | Fixed. Never positioned. |
| P-04 | Structure share | Core | 15% | 15% | 15% | Fixed. Never positioned. |
| P-05 | Mechanical share | Core | 25% | 25% | 25% | Fixed. Never positioned. |
| P-06 | Electrical share | Core | 25% | 25% | 25% | Fixed. Never positioned. |
| P-07 | ELV | Add-on | 25% | 25% | 25% | Fixed. Never positioned. |
| P-08 | Rebar detailing | Add-on | 30% | 30% | 30% | Fixed. Never positioned. |
| P-09 | 4D/5D combined | Add-on | 10% | 15% | 30% | Card anchor. The card states 10-15-30 as three anchors, so the typical value is not the arithmetic midpoint of 20% (D-07). |
| P-10 | As-built | Add-on | 15% | 22.5% | 30% | Midpoint, a convention of this method rather than a figure the owner stated (D-08). |
| P-11 | Infrastructure | Add-on | 10% | 15% | 20% | Midpoint, a convention of this method rather than a figure the owner stated (D-08). |
| P-12 | AIR | Add-on | 15% | 15% | 15% | Fixed. Never positioned. |
What a figure here excludes
Every figure this tool produces is a direct production cost, not a selling price. Excludes VAT, IT infrastructure, software and hardware, overhead, profit and the other exclusions stated by the methodology.
View full exclusions
- VAT (15% in KSA at the time of writing; confirm at quote date).
- IT infrastructure: software licences, hardware and hosting.
- Overhead: office, management and administration costs.
- Profit.
- Laser scanning or site survey for as-built work.
- Travel, site attendance and client meetings beyond the norm.
- Rework caused by client design changes after model freeze.
Limitations of this method
- Scope and sheet count, not the rate, drive most of the uncertainty. The core split alone moves the fee between 15% and 100% of B, and the ranged add-ons vary up to three times between Simple and Complex (§11).
- Core shares are fixed for every building type. A hospital MEP likely exceeds 50% of effort and a car park structure likely exceeds 15%, and this method cannot express either (L-03, D-05).
- Rates are linear in area: no volume discount for large projects and no floor for small ones (L-04, D-03, D-04).
- Rebar detailing at 30% is twice the structural model at 15%. Clients may challenge that line; explain the basis and confirm it in calibration (L-05).
- Infrastructure is priced on building floor area, and linear or site-wide works may not relate to A at all (L-06, D-06).
- There is no price date and no escalation. Rates drift with the market (L-09).
- The route changes the fee. Pricing the same project on area alone or on sheets alone gives very different answers when the count is off, and the routes agree only near one sheet count per unit area (L-10).
- Section 6 positioning descriptors were drafted for the owner rather than written by him, and are not yet his own criteria (L-07).
- Methodology record bim-modelling-fee-v1, version 0.13.0, approved by its owner on 22 September 2026 for preliminary guidance and early-stage estimation, and for nothing beyond that. §1.1 permits this bounded preliminary release while the tool reports NOT_CALIBRATED; v0.13 then required the sheet count to be a positive integer, and changed no formula, coefficient, rate, share or threshold. That is the owner’s own sign-off, not an independent review: reviewers, none. It is not a validation, a calibration or a certification, and it does not approve the parameter register, which stays Draft. No calibration against project outcomes has taken place, and calibration is the gate for any reliance stronger than preliminary guidance and early-stage estimation — which is why every result here requires professional review before it reaches a quotation, a fee submission, a tender, a procurement decision, detailed budgeting or a contract commitment.
For a sheet count you can defend, or a headcount, carry your figures by hand to a sheet count you can defend, headcount or team composition. No value passes automatically between these tools.
Methodology bim-modelling-fee-v1, version 0.13.0, status OWNER_APPROVED, Register v0.11, 17 September 2026. Owner Hossam Farag, who approved it on 2026-09-22 for preliminary guidance and early-stage estimation, and for nothing beyond that. That is the owner’s own sign-off and not an independent review: reviewers, none. It is not a validation, a calibration or a certification, and it does not approve the parameter register, which stays Draft. No calibration against project outcomes has taken place. Substantively modified 2026-09-20.